comparison · Privacy email
cock.li vs mailbox.org
Both are listed in Privacy email. The table below pulls directly from each service’s data sheet; see each entry for sourcing.
| Field | cock.li | mailbox.org |
|---|---|---|
| KYC | no KYC | optional KYC |
| Category | Privacy email | Privacy email |
| Jurisdiction | Romania (operator-disclosed) | Germany (operator-disclosed) |
| Payment methods | crypto | cash-by-mail, bank-transfer, card, paypal |
| Fiat on-ramp | no | no |
| Custodial | yes | yes |
| Open source | no | no |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Last verified | Jan 1, 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 |
cock.li — summary
cock.
- + One of the longest-running zero-data email signup services.
- + No recovery address — strictly self-key.
- + Tor-friendly; clearnet and onion both supported.
- − Many third parties blocklist the entire @cock.li domain because of historical abuse.
- − No paid tier; the project is operator-funded and donation-supported.
- − PGP-only encryption.
mailbox.org — summary
mailbox.
- + Cash-by-mail funding accepted, similar to Posteo's posture.
- + PGP-aware web client and PGP-on-arrival encryption-at-rest options.
- + Full IMAP/SMTP plus a usable webmail.
- − German jurisdiction; same legal-process exposure as Tuta and Posteo.
- − Paid-only — no free tier.
- − PGP encryption is opt-in; not in-protocol like Tuta.
When to choose which
Treat this section as heuristic. Privacy properties depend on how you use the service, not just which one you pick.
- Choose cock.li if one of the longest-running zero-data email signup services..
- Choose mailbox.org if cash-by-mail funding accepted, similar to posteo's posture..
- Either way, re-check the entry’s last verified date — the Privacy email category churns.
Mentioned in (combined)
Pages on the site that reference cock.li, mailbox.org, or both.
Ranked picks
Quick answers
Country pages
Compared as of .